<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rental property | Lukinski</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lukinski.com/tag/rental-property-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lukinski.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Berlin &#124; Friedrichshain &#124; Apartment building &#124; 2,680,000 € with approx. 3.75% return</title>
		<link>https://lukinski.com/berlin-friedrichshain-apartment-building-2680000-e-with-approx-3-75-return/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L_kinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedrichshain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liegenschaftskarte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental property]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lukinski.de/berlin-friedrichshain-apartment-building-2680000-e-with-approx-3-75-return/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An Apartment building in Berlin-Friedrichshain for 2.68 million € with a 3.75 % gross yield — that sounds like solid Berlin standard at first glance. Yet behind the raw number lies a unique playing field in this district, shaped by neighborhood protection, right of first refusal, and a tenant structure that recalibrates every classic investment [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Apartment building in <strong>Berlin-Friedrichshain</strong> for 2.68 million € with a 3.75 % gross yield — that sounds like solid Berlin standard at first glance. Yet behind the raw number lies a unique playing field in this district, shaped by neighborhood protection, right of first refusal, and a tenant structure that recalibrates every classic investment calculation. Anyone buying here should calculate the <a href="https://lukinski.com/purchase-price-factor/">purchase price factor</a>, calculate the <a href="https://lukinski.com/net-return/">net return</a>, and above all understand how <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-capital-investment-attention-interview-lukinski-expert/">real estate as an investment</a> functions in a regulated inner-city market in the long term. This article places the property within the Friedrichshain market — micro-location, numbers, risks, taxes, financing, and exit.</p>
<h2>Micro-location Friedrichshain: Why this district ticks differently</h2>
<p>Friedrichshain is not just a &#8220;trendy neighborhood&#8221; — it is one of the densest and most strictly regulated housing markets in Berlin. The district of Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg has enacted social preservation regulations under <strong>§ 172 BauGB</strong> over large parts, which has direct consequences for any existing property strategy.</p>
<h3>The regulatory pillars</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Neighborhood protection:</strong> Modernizations, floor plan changes, and conversion into condominiums require approval or are excluded.</li>
<li><strong>Right of first refusal:</strong> The district can exercise this right when purchasing in protected neighborhoods in favor of municipal housing companies — avoidance agreements are often mandatory.</li>
<li><strong>Tenant structure:</strong> High proportion of long-term existing tenants with contracts significantly below market rent — rental growth potential is real, but slow.</li>
<li><strong>Buyer profile:</strong> Family offices, long-term property holders with a 10–20 year horizon, few traders or short-term flippers.</li>
<li><strong>Building stock:</strong> predominantly Wilhelmine-era buildings between Boxhagener Platz, Simon-Dach-Kiez and RAW site, plus renovated DDR panel buildings towards Friedrichsfelde.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Kiez Differentiation</h3>
<p>Friedrichshain is not a homogeneous district — those who calculate in general terms overlook a 20–30 % price difference over just a few hundred metres. Three micro-locations are distinct from an investment perspective:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Boxhagener Kiez:</strong> renovated old buildings, gastronomy-focused, highest €/m² levels, low vacancy risk</li>
<li><strong>Samariterviertel:</strong> heterogeneous stock, more renovation potential, slightly lower factors</li>
<li><strong>Stralauer Halbinsel &#038; Mediaspree:</strong> new construction, less social housing protection, different buyer segment (institutional)</li>
</ul>
<p>Exactly this combination makes the district attractive for property owners: demand is structurally tight, vacancy is practically zero, while aggressive value creation strategies (subdivision, luxury renovation, self-occupation) are largely excluded due to regulatory restrictions.</p>
<h3>Friedrichshain in the Berlin District Comparison</h3>
<p>Who calculates Friedrichshain must know the alternatives — the district is a compromise between location, regulation, and factor:</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Bezirk</th>
<th>Faktor MFH (Bestand)</th>
<th>Milieuschutz-Anteil</th>
<th>Mietsteigerungs-Spielraum</th>
<th>Investor-Logik</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Mitte / Tiergarten</td>
<td>30 – 40</td>
<td>pointed</td>
<td>medium</td>
<td>Trophy asset, low return</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prenzlauer Berg</td>
<td>28 – 35</td>
<td>comprehensive</td>
<td>low</td>
<td>stable, little leverage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Friedrichshain</strong></td>
<td><strong>26 – 32</strong></td>
<td><strong>comprehensive</strong></td>
<td><strong>medium</strong></td>
<td><strong>Cash flow + long-term value</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Neukölln (North)</td>
<td>22 – 28</td>
<td>partially</td>
<td>high</td>
<td>Value-add, higher risk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lichtenberg / Friedrichsfelde</td>
<td>20 – 26</td>
<td>hardly</td>
<td>high</td>
<td>Growth business, less substance</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" src="https://lukinski.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/villa-berlin-makler-beispiel-expose-foto-sommer-vergleich-winter-sommeraufnahme-garten.jpg" alt="Sell villa Berlin: List, evaluation, prices, real estate agent, mistakes, experiences" loading="lazy"/></figure>
<h2>Price level: What does a square meter really cost in Friedrichshain?</h2>
<p>The price ranges in Friedrichshain are significantly above the Berlin average — the district belongs to the top 5 locations in the city, on par with Prenzlauer Berg and below Mitte-Tiergarten. Anyone who wants to <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-evaluate-factors-on-line-free-of-charge-flat-house-multi-family-house/">evaluate a property</a> or <a href="https://lukinski.com/calculate-property-value-free-of-charge-for-purchase-investment-sale-and-letting/">calculate the property value</a> cannot do without a very detailed micro-location analysis.</p>
<h3>Prices by location and segment</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Location / Segment</th>
<th>Purchase €/m² (Existing)</th>
<th>New Lease €/m² Cold Rent</th>
<th>Factor (Purchase/Annual Rent)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Friedrichshain — Boxhagener Kiez (Old building renovated)</td>
<td>6.500 – 8.000</td>
<td>16 – 20</td>
<td>28 – 35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Friedrichshain — Samariterviertel (Old building mixed)</td>
<td>5.500 – 7.000</td>
<td>14 – 17</td>
<td>26 – 32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Friedrichshain — Stralauer Halbinsel (New build)</td>
<td>7.000 – 9.500</td>
<td>17 – 22</td>
<td>27 – 33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Berlin — City average apartment building</td>
<td>4.500 – 5.800</td>
<td>11 – 14</td>
<td>22 – 28</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Context of the specific property</h3>
<p>The offered apartment building with a factor of ~26.7 (2.68 million € / ~100,500 € annual net cold rent at 3.75%) lies at the lower end of the Friedrichshain range — an indication of either conservatively set rents (existing tenants well below market) or renovation backlog. Both typical and both a lever.</p>
<blockquote><p>Rule of thumb Berlin city center: A factor below 25 is rare and usually comes with risk, above 35 is speculation on rent increases. A factor of 26–30 is the real investment corridor in Friedrichshain.</p></blockquote>
<h3>What exactly drives the price</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Existing rent delta:</strong> If rents are 25–40 % below local standards, that&#8217;s an embedded value recovery path — but stretched out over time due to the capping limit.</li>
<li><strong>Building condition:</strong> Old buildings without major renovations will quickly cost 800–1,500 €/m² later on.</li>
<li><strong>Energy efficiency:</strong> Building class influences refinancing margins and ESG-eligible buyer groups at exit.</li>
<li><strong>Tenant structure:</strong> high turnover = faster rent alignment, low turnover = stable cash flows.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Return calculation: From 3.75 % gross to the real cash-on-cash return</h2>
<p>The stated 3.75% is a gross yield — and that&#8217;s just the beginning of the calculation. Anyone who seriously calculates subtracts management costs, non-assessable items, and financing costs. For the structured derivation, <a href="https://lukinski.com/gross-yield/">Calculate Gross Yield</a>, the <a href="https://lukinski.com/cash-flow/">Cash Flow Calculator</a>, the <a href="https://lukinski.com/rental-yield-explained-build-wealth-definition-formula-for-your-yield-real-estate/">Rental Yield</a>, and a realistic approach to the <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/instandhaltungsrucklage/">Maintenance Reserve</hiddenlink> are helpful.</p>
<h3>Example calculation for this property</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Position</th>
<th>Amount p. a.</th>
<th>Remark</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Annual net cold rent</td>
<td>~ 100,500 €</td>
<td>3.75 % of 2.68 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>– Non-allocationable management</td>
<td>~ 4,500 €</td>
<td>250–350 € per unit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>– Maintenance reserve (old building)</td>
<td>~ 12,000 €</td>
<td>10–15 €/m²/year</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>– Rent default risk (2 %)</td>
<td>~ 2,000 €</td>
<td>conservative Berlin inner city</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>= Net rental income</strong></td>
<td><strong>~ 82,000 €</strong></td>
<td>Net return ~ 3.06 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>– Interest (60 % debt, 4.0 %)</td>
<td>~ 64,300 €</td>
<td>see financing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>= Cash flow before repayment &#038; control</strong></td>
<td><strong>~ 17,700 €</strong></td>
<td>on 1.07 million € equity</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Purchase-related costs in Berlin</h3>
<p>Berlin charges <strong>6.0 % land transfer tax</strong> one of the highest rates nationwide. The total ancillary costs are significant and must be included in the <a href="https://lukinski.com/financing/equity/">equity requirement calculation</a> logic.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Transfer tax:</strong> 6.0 % = 160,800 € (Details: <a href="https://lukinski.com/land-transfer-tax-federal-states-comparison-save-taxes-2026/">Transfer tax by federal state</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Notary &#038; Land Registry:</strong> approx. 1.5–2.0 % = 40,200 – 53,600 € (<hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/notarkosten/">Calculate notary costs</hiddenlink>)</li>
<li><strong>Real estate agent commission:</strong> often negotiated directly in Off-Market transactions (<hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/maklerprovision/">Calculate real estate agent commission</hiddenlink>)</li>
<li><strong>Total purchase-related costs:</strong> realistically 7.5–9.0 % = 200,000 – 240,000 €</li>
<li><strong>Total investment:</strong> ~ 2.88 – 2.92 Mio. €</li>
</ul>
<h3>Cash-on-Cash and real equity return</h3>
<p>With about 1.07 Mio. € equity share and approx. 17,700 € cash flow before amortization, a Cash-on-Cash return of about 1.65 % results. That seems low — but the key is the amortization component: With 1.5 % initial amortization, the investor builds up approx. 24,000 € equity annually. The real equity return before tax is therefore around 3.9 %, plus the unrealized value appreciation.</p>
<p>As described in the guide <a href="https://lukinski.com/buy-apartment-house-property-evaluation-procedure-costs-taxes-tenants/">Apartment building buy</a>, the effective return is typically shifted down by 0.2–0.3 percentage points due to purchase-related costs — which is mandatory in Berlin calculations.</p>
<h2>Financing: Bank logic for 2.68 million € in inner-city Berlin</h2>
<p>At this scale, the investor leaves the private customer business and enters commercial real estate banking — another Sparkasse department, different key figures, different conditions. Three factors determine the financing approval:</p>
<h3>The three bank key figures</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Loan-to-value ratio (LTV):</strong> Berlin banks typically finance MFH of this size up to 60–70 % of the loan value (not the purchase price). The loan value is usually 10–15 % below the purchase price — effectively financable often only 55–60 % of the purchase price.</li>
<li><strong>DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio):</strong> Ratio of net rental income to debt service. Banks want at least 1.2 — for this property: 82,000 € / 88,300 € (interest + repayment) = 0.93. That&#8217;s too low, higher repayment rates can only be achieved with additional equity.</li>
<li><strong>Interest rate lock:</strong> Standard 10 years, for MFH increasingly 15 or 20 years for cash flow security (see <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-financing-loan-types-interest-rates-comparison-free-calculator/">real estate financing</a>).</li>
</ul>
<h3>Concrete Financing Structure</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Position</th>
<th>Wert</th>
<th>Note</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Kaufpreis</td>
<td>2.680.000 €</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchase-related costs (~8 %)</td>
<td>214.400 €</td>
<td>aus EK</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Debt capital (60 % of KP)</td>
<td>1.608.000 €</td>
<td>typischer LTV</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eigenkapital gesamt</td>
<td>1.286.400 €</td>
<td>~ 44 % of the total investment</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Annuity at 4.0 % interest / 1.5 % amortization</td>
<td>~ 88.440 € p. a.</td>
<td>~ 7.370 €/Monat</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Restschuld nach 10 Jahren</td>
<td>~ 1.314.000 €</td>
<td>~ 294.000 € getilgt</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Who plans with less than ~1.1 million € Equity should not even bother to set up appointments in the Friedrichshain size class — the bank will reject the application or demand subordinated financing with significantly higher interest rates.</p>
<h2>The real risks: neighborhood protection, right of first refusal, rent control</h2>
<p>In Friedrichshain entscheidet nicht das Exposé über die Rendite, sondern das Bezirksamt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berlin &#124; Mitte &#124; Apartment building &#124; 15,000,000 € with approx. 2.9% return</title>
		<link>https://lukinski.com/berlin-mitte-apartment-building-15000000-e-with-approx-2-9-return/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L_kinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liegenschaftskarte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rentals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lukinski.de/berlin-mitte-apartment-building-15000000-e-with-approx-2-9-return/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An apartment building in Berlin-Mitte with a volume of around 15 million € and a gross return of 2.9% appears to be moderately priced at first glance — yet those who understand A-locations know: here, profits are not made through ongoing cash flow, but through substance, value appreciation, and rental adjustment potential. Before you place [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An apartment building in Berlin-Mitte with a volume of around 15 million € and a gross return of 2.9% appears to be moderately priced at first glance — yet those who understand A-locations know: here, profits are not made through ongoing cash flow, but through substance, value appreciation, and rental adjustment potential. Before you place a bid, you should calculate the <a href="https://lukinski.com/purchase-price-factor/">purchase price factor</a>, calculate the <a href="https://lukinski.com/net-return/">net return</a>, and clearly assess the role of real estate as an <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-capital-investment-attention-interview-lukinski-expert/">investment</a> in your overall strategy. This article places the specific property, the micro-location, and the typical return expectations of institutional investors in the center — including DSCR stress test, share deal modeling, and ESG risk profile.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" src="https://lukinski.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/villa-berlin-makler-beispiel-expose-foto-sommer-vergleich-winter-sommeraufnahme-garten.jpg" alt="Villa verkaufen Berlin: Liste, Bewertung, Preise, Makler, Fehler, Erfahrungen" loading="lazy"/></figure>
<h2>Berlin-Mitte: Micro-location, Buyer Profile, Price Level</h2>
<p>Berlin-Mitte is not a district, but a mosaic of neighborhoods with very different investment logic. Whoever understands Mitte as a return location must separate the sub-markets — because there are worlds of difference in factors and buyer profiles between Spandauer Vorstadt and Wedding.</p>
<h3>The most important sub-markets in the district of Mitte</h3>
<p>The following six neighborhoods shape the investment profile of Mitte. Each has its own buyer audience, its own price level and its own legal complexity — whoever speaks generally of &#8220;Mitte&#8221; regularly confuses the league.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Spandauer Vorstadt / Hackescher Markt:</strong> Gründerzeit-era old buildings, highest price per square meter in the district, international buyer audience, factor 32–40</li>
<li><strong>Rosenthaler Vorstadt:</strong> Premium-Altbau, high rental demand, many protected neighborhoods, Factor 30–36</li>
<li><strong>Friedrichstadt / Gendarmenmarkt:</strong> Mixed-use residential/commercial, representative addresses, Factor 28–34</li>
<li><strong>Tiergarten / Hansaviertel:</strong> Diplomatic district, quiet residential areas, low Offer, Factor 28–33</li>
<li><strong>Moabit:</strong> Ongoing appreciation, entry-level for institutional buyers, Factor 24–30</li>
<li><strong>Wedding (Mitte-Nord):</strong> Latecomer quarter with development potential, Factor 22–28</li>
</ul>
<h3>Price level in comparison</h3>
<p>The average housing prices in the district Mitte are significantly higher than the Berlin average. The following ranges are typical for multi-family homes in the core areas:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Location</th>
<th>Purchase Price €/m² (Existing Rented)</th>
<th>Factor (Gross Rent)</th>
<th>Gross Yield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spandauer Vorstadt</td>
<td>7.500 – 11.000</td>
<td>32 – 40</td>
<td>2,5 – 3,1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rosenthaler Vorstadt</td>
<td>6.800 – 9.500</td>
<td>30 – 36</td>
<td>2,8 – 3,3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tiergarten / Hansaviertel</td>
<td>6.500 – 9.000</td>
<td>28 – 33</td>
<td>3,0 – 3,6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moabit</td>
<td>4.800 – 6.800</td>
<td>24 – 30</td>
<td>3,3 – 4,2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wedding</td>
<td>4.000 – 5.800</td>
<td>22 – 28</td>
<td>3,6 – 4,5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Berlin Average</td>
<td>4.200 – 5.500</td>
<td>22 – 27</td>
<td>3,7 – 4,5%</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The 2.9% gross yield of the offered property corresponds to a <strong>factor of about 34</strong> — this is exactly the range traded in the premium sub-markets of Spandauer and Rosenthaler Vorstadt. Market-conform, but only attractive if there is potential for rent increases.</p>
<h3>Buyer profile and typical tickets</h3>
<p>The market for mid-sized multi-family homes between 10 and 30 million € is dominated by a limited number of institutional and semi-institutional buyers. Anyone bidding here should know the competition:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Family Offices DACH:</strong> Tickets 8–25 million, classic buy-&amp;-hold logic, often discreetly through specialist agents</li>
<li><strong>Family Offices Scandinavia / NL / CH:</strong> Tickets from 15 million, euro security motive, cash buyers</li>
<li><strong>Asset Managers (Patrizia, Industria, Becken, Hines):</strong> mostly from 20 million upwards, fund structure</li>
<li><strong>Berlin property holders (Bauwerk, Trockland, Ziegert business):</strong> opportunistic, often with subdivision ambitions</li>
<li><strong>Municipal housing companies (Howoge, Gewobag, degewo):</strong> pre-emption right buyers, press prices to market value</li>
<li><strong>Asian Family Offices (HK, Singapore):</strong> Rare, but strong in payments — prefer representation addresses on Gendarmenmarkt</li>
</ul>
<h2>The object in the factor check: 15 million € at 2.9%</h2>
<p>A 15 million euro object with a 2.9% gross return generates an annual target rent of about 435,000 €. With typical net cold rents in central Berlin of 14–18 €/m², this corresponds to a living area of about 2,000–2,600 m² — thus a classic Gründerzeit apartment building with 18 to 30 units.</p>
<blockquote><p>The factor in A-locations in Berlin is not a return signal, but a scarcity price. Whoever buys in the center buys the existing guarantee — the return comes from value appreciation, not from ongoing rent.</p></blockquote>
<h3>What justifies the factor in the center</h3>
<p>At first glance, factors around 34 for a cash flow investment seem ambitious. Six structural factors explain why institutional investors still accept this rating — and why the price level also remains surprisingly stable even during correction phases.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Location stability:</strong> The center does not lose its top address in any economic scenario</li>
<li><strong>Rent demand:</strong> Vacancy rate in the district permanently below 1%</li>
<li><strong>Rent increase potential:</strong> Existing rents often 30–50% below market rent</li>
<li><strong>Substance:</strong> Wilhelmine-era building with high value stability and scarcity premium</li>
<li><strong>International demand:</strong> Family Offices from DACH, Scandinavia, Asia as buyers</li>
<li><strong>Inflation protection:</strong> Tangible asset in a market near the ECB</li>
</ul>
<h3>From Gross to Net: The Honest Return Calculation</h3>
<p>The stated 2.9% is gross return — the truth lies beneath. When purchasing an existing multi-family house in Berlin, you must factor in the following deductions before even calculating the capital service:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Position</th>
<th>Assumption</th>
<th>Amount p.a.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gross rental income</td>
<td>2.9% of 15 million</td>
<td>435,000 €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent default risk</td>
<td>2%</td>
<td>– 8,700 €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Management (external, MFH rates)</td>
<td>25 €/unit/month × 24 units</td>
<td>– 7,200 €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Maintenance (Peters&#8217; formula, old building)</td>
<td>11–14 €/m² × 2,300 m²</td>
<td>– 28,000 €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Non-recoverable additional costs</td>
<td>approx. 5% of gross rent</td>
<td>– 21,750 €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Net cold rent before capital service</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>369,350 €</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Net return (NOI / purchase price)</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2.46%</strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Whoever reads &#8220;2.9% return&#8221; in marketing brochures is actually calculating with roughly <strong>2.4–2.5% net initial return</strong>. This is not a trick, but market standard — you just need to understand it.</p>
<h2>Total Return instead of Rental Return: The Real Calculation</h2>
<p>The 2.9% gross yield masks what institutional buyers in Mitte are actually calculating. The value development of the last decade in Berlin-Mitte ranged between 4.5% and 7% annually — while market rents were rising on average by 4–6% per year.</p>
<h3>Example Calculation 10-Year Horizon</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Position</th>
<th>Year 1</th>
<th>Year 10 (conservative)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchase price / market value</td>
<td>15,000,000 €</td>
<td>21,000,000 € (+3.5% p.a.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Target rent p.a.</td>
<td>435,000 €</td>
<td>610,000 € (rent adjustment)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gross yield</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>4.1% on original value</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Capital appreciation cumulative</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>+6.0 million €</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Return p.a.</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>approx. 6.5 – 7.5%</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Exactly here lies the difference between a cash flow investment in Moabit or Wedding and a substance investment in Mitte. Whoever uses the <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/cashflow/">cash flow calculator</hiddenlink> sees rarely a positive operating result at 2.9% — whoever understands the substance logic calculates over 10–15 years.</p>
<h3>Sensitivity Analysis: What happens under stress</h3>
<p>Total return models appear plausible as long as the assumptions hold. Three stress scenarios show how robust the investment really is:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Scenario</th>
<th>Value development p.a.</th>
<th>Rent adjustment p.a.</th>
<th>Total return p.a. after 10 years</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Best Case</td>
<td>+5.0%</td>
<td>+5.0%</td>
<td>approx. 8.5 – 9.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Base Case</td>
<td>+3.5%</td>
<td>+3.5%</td>
<td>approx. 6.5 – 7.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bear Case</td>
<td>+1.0%</td>
<td>+1.5%</td>
<td>approx. 3.5 – 4.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stress (Rent Cap Reload)</td>
<td>–1.0%</td>
<td>0%</td>
<td>approx. 1.5 – 2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Crash (Interest rate shock + correction)</td>
<td>–3.0%</td>
<td>+2.0%</td>
<td>approx. 0 – 1.0%</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>In the crash scenario, the investment earns nothing over 10 years — but also loses little in real terms, because the asset value cushions inflation. Exactly for this reason, institutional buyers pay the high factor: not for upside, but for downside protection.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" src="https://lukinski.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/stephan-czaja-berlin-immobilien-villa-stadthaus-makler-ankauf-exklusiv-web-stadthaus.jpg" alt="Stephan Czaja Berlin Immobilien Villa Stadthaus Makler Ankauf exklusiv Stadthaus" loading="lazy"/></figure>
<h2>Rent adjustment potential: The most important value lever question</h2>
<p>The entire investment case depends on one question: How quickly and how much can the existing rent be brought up to the market rent? Berlin has one of the strictest regulations in Germany — those who do not understand this in detail systematically overestimate the value lever.</p>
<h3>The legal limits of rent adjustment</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ceiling limit:</strong> Maximum 15% within 3 years (§ 558 Abs. 3 BGB, reduced form in Berlin)</li>
<li><strong>Berlin rent index:</strong> Adjustment only up to the local comparative rent according to the qualified rent index</li>
<li><strong>Rent brake:</strong> When reletting, maximum 10% above the local comparative rent</li>
<li><strong>Modernization surcharge:</strong> 8% of the modernization costs per year on the rent (§ 559 BGB), capped</li>
<li><strong>Index rent (§ 557b BGB):</strong> Linked to the consumer price index — often the most efficient value lever in older buildings</li>
<li><strong>Index rent (§ 557a BGB):</strong> Pre-agreed rent increases — rarely achievable for existing tenants</li>
</ul>
<h3>Realistic rent adjustment in 10 years</h3>
<p>For an existing property with an average rent of 9 €/m² and market rent of 16 €/m² (gap 78%), the realistic adjustment looks like this:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Tenant turnover rate:</strong> approx. 4–6% p.a. → 40–60% of units relet in 10 years</li>
<li><strong>Reletting:</strong> Jump to market rent + 10% (rent cap) upon renovation</li>
<li><strong>Existing stock remains:</strong> Adjustment above the cap limit of 15%/3 years = approx. 4.7% p.a.</li>
<li><strong>Composite calculation of target rent:</strong> realistically +35–55% in 10 years — rarely the fully exploited 78%</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyone who generally calculates a &#8220;30–50% uplift&#8221; is on the lower end correct. Anyone expecting 70%+ is dreaming — unless they buy with vacancies or are allowed to renovate comprehensively (see neighborhood protection).</p>
<h2>Neighborhood protection and rental law: The decisive risk factor</h2>
<p>Large parts of Berlin-Mitte are protected under the social preservation ordinance according to § 172 of the Building Code — known as Milieuschutz. This is the most important legal preliminary check for any</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berlin &#124; Friedrichshain &#124; Apartment building &#124; 3,100,000 € with approx. 5.00% return</title>
		<link>https://lukinski.com/berlin-friedrichshain-apartment-building-3100000-e-with-approx-5-00-return/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L_kinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedrichshain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liegenschaftskarte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rentals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lukinski.de/berlin-friedrichshain-apartment-building-3100000-e-with-approx-5-00-return/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An Apartment building in Berlin-Friedrichshain with a purchase price of 3,100,000 € and approximately 5.00 % gross return is a statement in the current Berlin market — the capital city average for comparable existing properties is 3.2–3.8 %. What makes this real estate as an investment special can only be understood if one considers micro-location, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="https://lukinski.com/buy-apartment-house-property-evaluation-procedure-costs-taxes-tenants/">Apartment building</a> in Berlin-Friedrichshain with a purchase price of 3,100,000 € and approximately 5.00 % gross return is a statement in the current Berlin market — the capital city average for comparable existing properties is 3.2–3.8 %. What makes this <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-capital-investment-attention-interview-lukinski-expert/">real estate as an investment</a> special can only be understood if one considers micro-location, rental structure, neighborhood protection, and the <a href="https://lukinski.com/purchase-price-factor/">price factor</a> together. This guide breaks down the numbers, shows the typical mistakes in return evaluation in Friedrichshain, and clearly explains for which investor profile this property makes sense.</p>
<h2>Friedrichshain: Micro-location and Buyer Profile</h2>
<p>Friedrichshain is one of the densest and youngest districts of Berlin — the proportion of tenants is around 90 %, the average age is under 38 years. For investors, this means: high and stable rental rates, short vacancy periods, but also a politically aware tenant base and a district office that actively enforces neighborhood protection.</p>
<h3>Demographics and Tenant Profile</h3>
<p>The tenant base in Friedrichshain is academic, urban, and mobile — this shapes both the ability to pay as well as the expectations regarding furnishings and communication with landlords. Those who buy here almost never take over a &#8220;quiet&#8221; tenant structure, but rather one that knows rental price guidelines and tenant rights.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Tenant proportion:</strong> approx. 90 % — one of the highest rates in Berlin</li>
<li><strong>Age structure:</strong> median under 38 years, high proportion of 25–40</li>
<li><strong>Household size:</strong> predominantly 1–2 people, many singles and couples without children</li>
<li><strong>Tenant turnover:</strong> 8–12 % p.a. — higher than the Berlin average, good for rent adjustments</li>
<li><strong>Payment reliability:</strong> very stable, rent arrears rate under 1.5 %</li>
</ul>
<h3>Submarkets within Friedrichshain</h3>
<p>Within the district, the locations are priced and in demand very differently. The property for 3.1 million € typically falls into one of the following microlocations:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Boxhagener Kiez (Boxi):</strong> most expensive submarket, historic building ensembles, high rental prices, almost entirely protected under the social housing program</li>
<li><strong>Samariterviertel:</strong> quieter, family-friendly, dominated by historic buildings, strong value increase in recent years</li>
<li><strong>Stralauer Kiez / Rummelsburger Bucht:</strong> water location, mix of new construction and renovated historic buildings, highest new construction rents</li>
<li><strong>Friedrichshain-Nord (around Landsberger Allee):</strong> characterized by panel housing, lower €/m², but stable cash flow locations</li>
<li><strong>Frankfurter Allee Süd / Traveplatz:</strong> up-and-coming location with the highest potential for value increase</li>
</ul>
<figure><img decoding="async" src="https://lukinski.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/villa-berlin-makler-beispiel-expose-foto-sommer-vergleich-winter-sommeraufnahme-garten.jpg" alt="Apartment building Friedrichshain Berlin Investment Capital investment" loading="lazy"/><figcaption>Friedrichshain: Historic apartment districts shape the investment market for apartment buildings.</figcaption></figure>
<h2>Price ranges: What does an apartment building in Friedrichshain cost?</h2>
<p>The following table shows typical market values for existing apartment buildings in Friedrichshain compared to the Berlin average — based on sales data from the last quarters.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Mikrolage</th>
<th>Kaufpreis €/m²</th>
<th>Netto-Kaltmiete €/m²</th>
<th>Kaufpreisfaktor</th>
<th>Bruttorendite</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Boxhagener Kiez</td>
<td>6.500–8.000</td>
<td>15–18</td>
<td>30–35×</td>
<td>2,9–3,3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Samariterviertel</td>
<td>5.800–7.000</td>
<td>14–17</td>
<td>28–32×</td>
<td>3,1–3,5 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stralauer Kiez</td>
<td>6.000–7.500</td>
<td>14–17</td>
<td>29–33×</td>
<td>3,0–3,4 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Friedrichshain-Nord</td>
<td>4.200–5.500</td>
<td>11–13</td>
<td>26–30×</td>
<td>3,3–3,8 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>This property</strong></td>
<td><strong>depending on the size</strong></td>
<td><strong>Stock</strong></td>
<td><strong>~20×</strong></td>
<td><strong>5,00 %</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Berlin Overall</td>
<td>4.500–6.500</td>
<td>12–15</td>
<td>25–32×</td>
<td>3,1–4,0 %</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A factor of 20× — as implied by this object&#8217;s calculation — is unusually low in Friedrichshain. This typically has one or more of the following reasons: renovation backlog, existing rents significantly below the rent index with potential for increase, ownership structure (inheritance community, off-market), or an object with a special situation (inheritance lease, restricted buildability).</p>
<blockquote><p>Memorable sentence: With a gross return of 5% on a Berlin top market, the interesting question is not &#8220;Why so high?&#8221; but &#8220;Which leverage or which risk is included?&#8221; — exactly here, the real net return is decided.</p></blockquote>
<h2>From 5% Gross to Real Net Return</h2>
<p>The most common mistake with Berlin return objects: confusing gross return with what actually ends up with the investor after costs, taxes, and reserves. The difference is significant.</p>
<h3>The Calculation Step by Step</h3>
<p>Starting from a purchase price of 3.1 million € and a 5% gross return, a yearly net cold rent of 155,000 € results. From this, the following must be deducted:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Non-recoverable operating costs:</strong> approx. 8–12 % of the net cold rent (management, bank fees, risk of rent default)</li>
<li><strong>Reserve for maintenance:</strong> in Berlin old buildings realistically 12–18 €/m² living area per year, not the often cited 7.10 € of the II. BV</li>
<li><strong>Purchase-related costs amortized:</strong> 6 % land transfer tax Berlin + notary/land register approx. 1.5 % + possibly real estate agent</li>
<li><strong>Financing costs:</strong> interest rates depend on the equity investment</li>
<li><strong>Taxes:</strong> depreciation benefit for old buildings 2 % linear, significantly higher for listed buildings/renovations</li>
</ul>
<p>Realistically, the net yield before taxes for this property is between 3.0 and 3.6 % — depending on the renovation status and existing rental rates. Those who carefully go through this with a <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/cashflow/">cash flow calculator</hiddenlink> and the <a href="https://lukinski.com/net-return/">net yield calculation</a> beforehand avoid disappointment in the second year.</p>
<h3>Rent increase potential as a lever</h3>
<p>Existing multi-family homes in Friedrichshain often have existing rents of 7–10 €/m² net cold — compared to market rents of 14–18 €/m². This delta is the real value. Upon tenant change, the rent can be increased to the local comparable rent plus 10 % (§ 556d BGB rent cap), with additional requirements in protected areas.</p>
<h3>Typical valuation errors</h3>
<p>Many buyers calculate with gross values and forget that the true return only becomes visible after operating costs. Three errors occur particularly frequently:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Rent default risk ignored:</strong> 2 % of the target rent is realistic, not zero</li>
<li><strong>Reserve too low:</strong> 7.10 €/m² is not enough for old buildings — 12–18 €/m² are the reality</li>
<li><strong>Management costs underestimated:</strong> 25–35 €/unit/month with external management</li>
<li><strong>CapEx forgotten:</strong> Roof, facade, heating are not a reserve, but a capital investment</li>
</ul>
<h2>Protected area status: The decisive factor in Friedrichshain</h2>
<p>Large parts of Friedrichshain are designated as social preservation areas under § 172 of the Building Code — colloquially known as Milieuschutz. For investors, this has four specific consequences that directly affect the purchase price and strategy:</p>
<h3>Concrete Implications for the Investor</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Local Right of First Refusal:</strong> The district can enter the business when selling, often in favor of state-owned housing companies</li>
<li><strong>Opt-out Declaration:</strong> The buyer can opt out of the right of first refusal by committing to socially acceptable management — typically 20 years</li>
<li><strong>Modernization Permit:</strong> Luxury renovations (second bathroom, restoration of stucco above standard) require approval and are usually rejected</li>
<li><strong>Division Ban:</strong> Conversion into condominiums is practically not possible</li>
<li><strong>Rent increases capped:</strong> Modernization charges are limited to a maximum of 2 €/m² over 6 years</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Insider Discount</h3>
<p>The insider tip: Exactly because partitioning and luxury renovation are blocked, Milieuschutz areas significantly depress the purchase price — factors lie 3–5 points below comparable areas without Milieuschutz. Those who hold the property long-term as a cash flow investment and do not look for privatization benefit from the discount without experiencing any real disadvantages.</p>
<blockquote><p>Strategic note: A 5% gross object in a Milieuschutz area is usually not a bug, but a feature — the market prices in the restriction, the buy-and-hold investor benefits.</p></blockquote>
<figure><img decoding="async" src="https://lukinski.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/stephan-czaja-berlin-immobilien-villa-stadthaus-makler-ankauf-exklusiv-web-stadthaus.jpg" alt="Stephan Czaja Berlin Immobilien Mehrfamilienhaus Investment" loading="lazy"/><figcaption>Milieuschutz shapes the investment logic in Friedrichshain more strongly than any other regulation.</figcaption></figure>
<h2>Funding and equity for 3.1 million €</h2>
<p>For an apartment building of this size, German banks typically require 20–30 % equity plus purchase-related costs. As described in the <a href="https://lukinski.com/real-estate-financing-loan-types-interest-rates-comparison-free-calculator/">Real Estate Financing Guide</a>, the bank&#8217;s loan-to-value logic is crucial.</p>
<h3>Capital Requirements at a Glance</h3>
<p>The following items make up the realistic equity requirement for purchasing a Berlin apartment building for 3.1 million € — purchase-related costs must come entirely from equity, as banks do not finance this:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Purchase price:</strong> 3,100,000 €</li>
<li><strong>Land transfer tax Berlin (6 %):</strong> 186,000 €</li>
<li><strong>Notary and land register (~1.5 %):</strong> 46,500 €</li>
<li><strong>Real estate agent commission (if applicable, 3.57 % buyer share):</strong> up to 110,670 €</li>
<li><strong>Equity minimum 20 % purchase price:</strong> 620,000 €</li>
<li><strong>Total equity requirement:</strong> approx. 850,000–965,000 €</li>
</ul>
<h3>Loan Strategies</h3>
<p>The exact requirement is calculated by the <a href="https://lukinski.com/equity/">equity requirement calculator</a>, the additional costs by the <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/kaufnebenkosten/">purchase additional costs calculator</hiddenlink>, and the <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/notarkosten/">notary costs</hiddenlink> separately. For tax optimization when selling later, the <a href="https://lukinski.com/sell-2/speculation-period/">speculation period</a> of 10 years is important — after that, the capital gain for private individuals is tax-free.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Annuity loan:</strong> Standard, repayment 2–3 % initially, interest period 10–15 years</li>
<li><strong>Balloon loan:</strong> with repayment replacement through life insurance or deposit</li>
<li><strong>KfW programs:</strong> attractive conditions for energy-efficient renovation</li>
<li><strong>GbR/GmbH structure:</strong> sensible for larger portfolios regarding depreciation and liability</li>
</ul>
<h2>Checklist: Due Diligence Apartment building Friedrichshain</h2>
<p>Before submitting an offer, these points should be clearly clarified:</p>
<ul>
<li>☐ Is the property located in a protected area? (Inquiry at the district office, view the map)</li>
<li>☐ Current tenant list with move-in date and net cold rent per unit</li>
<li>☐ Delta between existing rent and local comparable rent (Berlin rent index)</li>
<li>☐ Energy certificate and renovation status heating/roof/facade</li>
<li>☐ Minutes of the last 3 homeowners&#8217; meetings or management reports</li>
<li>☐ Amount of existing <hiddenlink href="https://lukinski.de/instandhaltungsrucklage/">maintenance reserve fund</hiddenlink></li>
<li>☐ Outstanding modernization or renovation needs (DIN 18205 demand planning)</li>
<li>☐ Current land register extract — encumbrances, right of way, leasehold?</li>
<li>☐ Building encumbrance register and contaminated sites register checked</li>
<li>☐ Appraisal or independent <a href="https://lukinski.com/appraising-multi-family-housing-market-value-valuation-purchase-price-property/">apartment building rating</a></li>
<li>☐ Calculation according to <a href="https://lukinski.com/income-approach-apartment-house-apartment-building-real-estate-valuation/">income value method</a> as a plausibility check</li>
<li>☐ Bank financing commitment before notary appointment</li>
</ul>
<h2>Berlin as an investment location — Assessment</h2>
<p>Berlin remains one of the most sought-after investment locations in the federal comparison, driven by population growth (over 3.8 million inhabitants), a low homeownership rate of under 20 %, and new construction that has not met demand for years. The market analysis in the <a href="https://lukinski.de/immobilien-kaufen-2026-marktanalyse-preise-prognose/">Real Estate Buying Market Situation Guide</a> shows that prices have reached a bottom after the correction phase and returns have become more attractive again.</p>
<h3>Friedrichshain in the District Comparison</h3>
<p>Friedrichshain ist in einer Liga für sich: zentrale Innenstadtlage, S-Bahn-Ring, U-Bahn-Anschluss U5, junge Bevölkerungsstruktur, wirtschaftliche Dynamik durch Mediaspree und Tech-Cluster. Dies macht die Leerstandsgefahr fast nicht existent – der Preis dafür ist die hohe Dichte an Vorschriften.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Location:</strong> within the S-Bahn ring, directly adjacent to Mitte</li>
<li><strong>Transport:</strong> U5, S-Bahn ring, several tram lines</li>
<li><strong>Economy:</strong> Mediaspree, tech clusters, Ostbahnhof</li>
<li><strong>Vacancy:</strong> factually under 1 %</li>
<li><strong>Value stability:</strong> high, as the location is not replicable</li>
</ul>
<h3>Realistically assess risks</h3>
<p>No market is risk-free — Berlin is no exception. Political interventions (rent cap discussions, debate on socialization), rising building interest and tax tightening are the three levers investors should be aware of. Those who hold long-term will survive cycles — those who speculate short-term risk it.</p>
<h2>FAQ: Apartment building in Friedrichshain as an investment</h2>
<h3>Is a 5 % gross yield in Friedrichshain realistic?</h3>
<p>Not in the market average — typical existing properties in Friedrichshain range between 3.0–3.5 % gross yield. A 5 % mark indicates that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tenancy law &#8211; trespass by your landlord</title>
		<link>https://lukinski.com/tenancy-law-trespass-by-your-landlord/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family with children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trespassing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[企业家]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lukinski.de/tenancy-law-trespass-by-your-landlord/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many landlords are worried about their property and don&#8217;t trust their tenants. They have heard too many horror stories of filthy apartments, sick pets or messies and therefore want to take a look at your property regularly. However, these cases are definitely the exception to the rule, as most tenants treat the rental property with [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many landlords are worried about their property and don&#8217;t trust their tenants. They have heard too many horror stories of filthy apartments, sick pets or messies and therefore want to take a look at your property regularly. However, these cases are definitely the exception to the rule, as most tenants treat the rental property with care and maintain it properly. So, is it permissible for the landlord to regularly disturb the privacy of his tenant?</p>
<h2>Trespassing &#8211; when is the landlord allowed in the rental property and when is he not?</h2>
<p>Tenancy law sees no reason whatsoever for the landlord to have a general right of control over his property. On the contrary, the landlord surrenders his domiciliary rights to the tenant when he lets the property. This means that the tenant then has the right to decide who he lets into the rented property and who not. This also includes the landlord, who can be prevented by his tenant from entering the rented property. But what exactly are the rules, what does the law require, and can the landlord be trespassing in his own property?</p>
<h3>Apartment inspection by the landlord &#8211; only possible with concrete reason</h3>
<p>In some cases, however, it is necessary for the landlord to enter the rented property. With notice and a separate reason, the landlord also has the right to do so. Such cases include, for example, the reading of the heating cost allocator or the water meters. However, the landlord may also enter the property for maintenance work or repairs. For the landlord, however, these cases are usually in his own interest, since the rental property is maintained by these. But also other reasons are permissible for a visit of the landlord. For example, if the landlord suspects that the tenant is using the rented property in breach of contract, he can enter the rented property with an announced visit. However, the tenant must still consent to the entry. An example of this could be keeping pets that are not allowed or subletting to third parties without permission. Here, however, caution to landlords. Such a visit is only legal with notice and the tenant&#8217;s consent. The use of the key to the rental property without prior permission is inadmissible.</p>
<h3>Trespass by the landlord &#8211; entering the rented property without permission</h3>
<p>Entering the rental object without notice and permission of the tenant, for example by means of a duplicate key, is inadmissible. Such conduct by the landlord entitles the tenant to terminate the rental property without notice. This also applies if the landlord has entered the property with good intentions, for example to carry out repairs. Trespassing on the rental property can also give the tenant notice, but whether this step is very smart depends on the situation. Without specific cause and notice, the landlord has no right to enter the rental property. However, in urgent cases, such as an emergency repair, or for factual reasons, such as handyman work, the tenant cannot deny the landlord access. One option landlords have is to put a clause in the lease that entitles them to make a routine inspection visit every one to two years. By signing the lease, the tenant grants the landlord permission to enter the apartment for such visits, but they must be announced. However, if you find a clause in your rental agreement that entitles the landlord to enter the rented property generally and without restriction. This is not legally binding and cannot be enforced in this way. So pay close attention to the wording in your rental agreement and point out any possible faulty clauses to your landlord before signing. If the landlord nevertheless enters the rented property without permission, for example with a duplicate key, he is committing trespass in his own property and can be reported to the police by the tenant for this.</p>
<h3>Next tenant wanted &#8211; apartment viewings and pictures in the still inhabited property</h3>
<p>Even after a termination, whether by the tenant or the landlord, the tenant has the right to still live in the apartment and prepare everything for the move. Within the normally three months notice period, in which the tenant still lives in the property, the same rules for visits apply as before. Especially during this period, the landlord is already looking for new tenants and viewing appointments are scheduled. However, there are special rules here as to when the landlord may and may not enter the rental property. The tenants do not have to accept any viewing tourism during the time they are still living in the property. Especially in desirable neighborhoods, new tenants often line up for the opportunity to view a new rental property. The rule here is that one to two viewing appointments are acceptable to the tenant. However, these must be announced three to four days in advance and approved by the tenant. The landlord must work around the tenant&#8217;s schedule for the appointment and accommodate individual work schedules, etc. Generally, inconvenience to the tenant should be kept to a minimum as they are still paying the full rent and the tenancy is still in place. However, pictures of the furnished property are not permitted by either the landlord or the viewing guests. The tenant must give express permission for pictures to be taken, otherwise the landlord must wait until the tenant has moved out before taking pictures. If he nevertheless takes pictures of the property without permission, he violates the personal rights of the tenant, even if he is the owner of the property.</p>
<h3>Tenancy dispute &#8211; Show trespass</h3>
<p>In order to report a trespass, it needs some legal basics. The exact legal situation states according to § 123 of the penal code:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any person who unlawfully enters the dwelling, business premises or enclosed property of another or any enclosed premises intended for public service or traffic, or who, while remaining therein without authority, fails to leave when requested to do so by the person entitled thereto, shall be liable to a custodial sentence not exceeding one year or to a monetary penalty.</p></blockquote>
<p>To enforce this law, the tenant must file a criminal complaint or trespass charge against the landlord within a period of 3 months after becoming aware of the offense. After this time limit has expired, an offence of trespass will usually not be prosecuted. However, only a lawyer can provide more detailed information and legal knowledge in tenancy law. See our <a href="https://lukinski.com/blog/">Lukinski Blog</a>. Whether this step is really sensible or whether it is sufficient, as a tenant with the landlord simply to speak out is situation-dependent differently. In such a case, it is better to consult a specialist in advance to cover all eventualities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rental agreement &#8211; how to terminate quickly and easily</title>
		<link>https://lukinski.com/rental-agreement-how-to-terminate-quickly-and-easily/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family with children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goethestraße]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holiday apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special termination rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lukinski.de/rental-agreement-how-to-terminate-quickly-and-easily/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A termination brings more formalities than you think. The well-known three months&#8217; notice is by no means all you need to know about tenancy agreements and how to terminate them. There are some stumbling blocks and many rights and claims that you should know. Of course, the legal situation varies depending on the rental agreement, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A termination brings more formalities than you think. The well-known three months&#8217; notice is by no means all you need to know about tenancy agreements and how to terminate them. There are some stumbling blocks and many rights and claims that you should know. Of course, the legal situation varies depending on the rental agreement, but there are some basic rules that everyone must follow.</p>
<h2>Terminate rental agreement &#8211; deadlines, delivery and special termination rights</h2>
<p>You want to expand, move to a new city or have to change your location for professional reasons. All reasons to cancel the rental apartment and start something new. But this is not as easy as you think, because there are many things to consider. From notice periods and special termination rights to tenant clauses and forms of termination.</p>
<h3>The lease agreement &#8211; how to terminate it and what it may contain</h3>
<p>The rental agreement is the most important document between tenant and landlord. However, what the rental agreement contains is hardly regulated by law and is primarily subject to the contracting parties. The points that are not found in a rental agreement are regulated by the German Civil Code (BGB). When signing the lease, however, caution is called for, because there are often hidden clauses that are not permitted at all. Particularly with the topic notice there are exact defaults. The example that probably most often leads to disputes is the waiver of notice, because it may not be set for a longer period than four years. If it is nevertheless, it is legally invalid. Also further regulations of the BGB say special rules with the lease. According to this, the deposit may not be higher than three months&#8217; rent. So before signing a rental agreement, find out exactly what is allowed and what is not.</p>
<p>If the time has come and the apartment is to be terminated, there are some formalities to be observed. Mistakes can make the termination ineffective and in the end lead to you having to pay double rent. The most important points that should be included in a notice are:</p>
<ul>
<li>The date on which notice is given</li>
<li>Name and address of both landlord and tenant</li>
<li>Explicit reference to the wish to terminate the contract</li>
<li>Signature of all rental parties</li>
<li>Exact address and concrete designation of the rental object</li>
<li>Withdrawal of direct debit mandate (if any)</li>
<li>Note on the return of the deposit (if deposited)</li>
<li>Agreement on the handover of the apartment + acceptance (incl. Is it a good investment? Find out: investment property. protocol)</li>
<li>Request for a written confirmation of the termination</li>
<li>Separately rented parking spaces must be cancelled individually</li>
</ul>
<h3>Notice periods: What are they?</h3>
<p>The notice periods are normally relatively simple. For tenants with an open-ended lease, the usual three months&#8217; notice applies, regardless of how long the tenant has lived there. Furthermore, the letter of termination must have reached the landlord by the third working day of a month. Tenants do not even need to give a specific reason for giving notice in this case. A later receipt will only result in a delay of one month. Tenants in such a tenancy can only make use of the termination without notice in special exceptional cases. These include, for example, emergencies such as severe mold infestation in the apartment or a sustained disturbance of domestic peace. Landlords have it in comparison much more difficult to terminate the tenant. They need a legally recognized reason for termination. Such reasons can be very different and range from use of the premises by the tenant contrary to the contract (e.g.: unauthorized renting to third parties) to disregard of the house rules or non-payment of rent. These reasons are legally recognized as grounds for termination without notice. If the landlord cannot prove that the tenant has acted in breach of contract, the tenant can only be terminated in special cases, e.g. in the case of personal need. The notice periods for termination by the landlord are based on the duration of the tenancy. In the case of a tenancy of up to five years, the normal three-month notice period applies. If the tenancy has been in place for more than five years, the notice period is six months. A tenancy of more than eight years results in a notice period of nine months.</p>
<h3>Termination of the lease &#8211; deliver correctly</h3>
<p>The German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB) states that termination of a tenancy agreement must be in writing (§ 568 BGB). However, this is not as simple as it may sound. E-mails, telegrams and faxes are inadmissible and are not recognised. The safest way is to send a notice of termination by registered mail with advice of receipt, because this way you can prove the termination in case of dispute. In general, however, it is better to be on the safe side when giving notice. Do not send them at the last minute, but rather a little in advance to meet all deadlines fairly. Especially when sending the letter by mail, it can always be that the recipient is not there and he therefore only receives a pick-up note. However, the notice is not considered delivered until the letter has been picked up. Another important formality is the signature under the notice. If this is not present from all tenants, the notice is not valid and you cannot be prosecuted.</p>
<h3>Special termination rights</h3>
<p>Special termination rights can, as the name suggests, only be used in special cases. These are always dependent on the respective rental agreement and the exact situation. The most common are:</p>
<h4>Announcement of a modernization</h4>
<p>when a modernisation is announced, the tenant has special rights of termination against the landlord. Example: If a modernization is announced in August, the tenant can give notice until September 30. The contract would then end on 30 October.</p>
<h4>Rent increase to the local comparative rent</h4>
<p>in the event of an impending rent increase, the tenant also has special rights. The period of notice is reduced to two months for him.</p>
<h4>Rent increase for social housing</h4>
<p>if the rent is increased in social housing, the tenant has the right to a shortened notice period. This is in this case one month</p>
<h4>Death of the tenant</h4>
<p>Should a tenant die, the tenancy does not end automatically. Life partners, spouses or heirs have one month to decide whether or not to continue the tenancy. If you decide not to, the three-month notice period applies.</p>
<h3>Providing a new tenant &#8211; Advantageous for the tenant</h3>
<p>Depending on the situation, it may be advantageous for the tenant to provide a new tenant. If the tenancy is no longer sustainable for the tenant due to a change of job or a change of life situation such as a child and too small living space, the tenant can provide a new tenant. However, it is a fact that the landlord does not have to accept every new tenant. The landlord must agree to the proposed new tenant. Another advantage arises when items such as the fitted kitchen or similar are to be taken over, because the tenant can clarify this directly with the next tenant and thus save money and time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
